From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arvie v. Cain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Dec 5, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14 -CV-03302 (W.D. La. Dec. 5, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14 -CV-03302

12-05-2016

RICKEY D. ARVIE D.O.C. # 448612 v. N. BURL CAIN


MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAY

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation (Rec. Doc.21) of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, after an independent review of the record, a de novo determination of the issues, and determining that the findings are correct under applicable law,

IT IS ORDERED that the petitioner's application is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

Lake Charles, Louisiana, this 5 day of December, 2016.

/s/_________

PATRICIA MINALDI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Arvie v. Cain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Dec 5, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14 -CV-03302 (W.D. La. Dec. 5, 2016)
Case details for

Arvie v. Cain

Case Details

Full title:RICKEY D. ARVIE D.O.C. # 448612 v. N. BURL CAIN

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION

Date published: Dec 5, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14 -CV-03302 (W.D. La. Dec. 5, 2016)

Citing Cases

Carey v. Vannoy

It may also have been sound strategy to avoid such testing and make use of the uncertainty to undermine the…