From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arunachalam v. Presidio Bank

Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 2020
141 S. Ct. 450 (2020)

Opinion

No. 19-8708.

10-05-2020

Lakshmi ARUNACHALAM, Petitioner, v. PRESIDIO BANK.


Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petition in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals , 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) ( per curiam ). The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.


Summaries of

Arunachalam v. Presidio Bank

Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 2020
141 S. Ct. 450 (2020)
Case details for

Arunachalam v. Presidio Bank

Case Details

Full title:Lakshmi ARUNACHALAM, Petitioner, v. PRESIDIO BANK.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States.

Date published: Oct 5, 2020

Citations

141 S. Ct. 450 (2020)
208 L. Ed. 2d 3