From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arugu v. Arugu

Supreme Court of Florida
May 25, 2005
905 So. 2d 125 (Fla. 2005)

Opinion

Case No. SC04-1371.

May 25, 2005.


Because it appears that petitioner was afforded a grace period to purge his contempt prior to the dismissal of his appeal, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Davidson v. District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, 501 So. 2d 603 (Fla. 1987); See also Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000) (holding that in order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, the petitioner must show that he has a clear legal right to performance of the requested act, that the respondent has an indisputable legal duty to perform that act, and that no other adequate remedy exists).

WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE and CANTERO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Arugu v. Arugu

Supreme Court of Florida
May 25, 2005
905 So. 2d 125 (Fla. 2005)
Case details for

Arugu v. Arugu

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH ARUGU, Petitioner(s) v. LAURETTA ARUGU, Respondent(s)

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: May 25, 2005

Citations

905 So. 2d 125 (Fla. 2005)