From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arturi v. Nifty Techs.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 22, 2022
21 Civ. 1270 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 22, 2022)

Opinion

21 Civ. 1270 (ER)

06-22-2022

DAVID ARTURI, Plaintiff, v. NIFTY TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and SHIV KAPOOR, Defendants.


ORDER

Ramos, D.J.

The Court having been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled, it is ORDERED, that the above-entitled action be and hereby is discontinued, without costs to either party, subject to reopening should the settlement not be consummated within forty-five (45) days of the date hereof.

Any application to reopen must be filed within forty-five (45) days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, the parties are advised that if they wish the Court to retain jurisdiction in this matter for purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the next forty-five (45) days with a request that the agreement be “so ordered” by the Court.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Arturi v. Nifty Techs.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 22, 2022
21 Civ. 1270 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 22, 2022)
Case details for

Arturi v. Nifty Techs.

Case Details

Full title:DAVID ARTURI, Plaintiff, v. NIFTY TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and SHIV KAPOOR…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 22, 2022

Citations

21 Civ. 1270 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 22, 2022)