From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Artistic Shoe Co., Inc. v. Winkelman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1931
232 App. Div. 844 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)

Opinion

March, 1931.


Order, and order as resettled, denying motion to direct plaintiff to serve an amended complaint affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to defendants to answer within ten days from service of a copy of the order herein. No opinion. Lazansky, P.J., Kapper, Hagarty and Davis, JJ., concur; Scudder, J., not voting.


Summaries of

Artistic Shoe Co., Inc. v. Winkelman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1931
232 App. Div. 844 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)
Case details for

Artistic Shoe Co., Inc. v. Winkelman

Case Details

Full title:ARTISTIC SHOE CO., INC., Respondent, v. JULES C. WINKELMAN and LOUIS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1931

Citations

232 App. Div. 844 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)