From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Artis v. Strickland

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jan 22, 2018
No. 17-7144 (4th Cir. Jan. 22, 2018)

Opinion

No. 17-7144

01-22-2018

ROSCOE ARTIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EARL H. STRICKLAND; NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR, Defendants - Appellees.

Roscoe Artis, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:17-ct-03065-BO) Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Roscoe Artis, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Roscoe Artis appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Artis v. Strickland, No. 5:17-ct-03065-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 11, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Artis v. Strickland

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jan 22, 2018
No. 17-7144 (4th Cir. Jan. 22, 2018)
Case details for

Artis v. Strickland

Case Details

Full title:ROSCOE ARTIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EARL H. STRICKLAND; NORTH CAROLINA…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jan 22, 2018

Citations

No. 17-7144 (4th Cir. Jan. 22, 2018)