From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Artimarfca v. Fastwares, LLC

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Mar 18, 2011
2:10-CV-1821 JCM (PAL) (D. Nev. Mar. 18, 2011)

Opinion

2:10-CV-1821 JCM (PAL).

March 18, 2011


ORDER


Presently before the court is plaintiff Lamborghini Artimarca, SpA's motion for default judgment. (Doc. #11).

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) "[w]hen a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party's default." Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2) provides that a court may enter a default judgment after the party seeking default applies to the clerk of the court as required by subsection (a) of this rule.

Here, defendant has been duly served ( see doc. #7), but has failed to respond to the complaint. Accordingly, plaintiff applied to the clerk of the court for entry of default against defendant on December 3, 2010 (doc. #8), and the clerk entered default on December 6, 2011, (doc. #9). Plaintiff now asks this court to enter judgment against the defendant, and the court finds that judgment to be proper under Rule 55.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that plaintiff's application for entry of default judgment (doc. #11) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall prepare and submit an appropriate final judgment for the court's review and signature.


Summaries of

Artimarfca v. Fastwares, LLC

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Mar 18, 2011
2:10-CV-1821 JCM (PAL) (D. Nev. Mar. 18, 2011)
Case details for

Artimarfca v. Fastwares, LLC

Case Details

Full title:LAMBORGHINI ARTIMARFCA, SpA, Plaintiff, v. FASTWARES, LLC, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Mar 18, 2011

Citations

2:10-CV-1821 JCM (PAL) (D. Nev. Mar. 18, 2011)