From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arthur v. Raborn

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston
Sep 9, 2021
No. 01-21-00072-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 9, 2021)

Opinion

01-21-00072-CV

09-09-2021

James P. Arthur, Mary Arthur, Legonite, Inc., Paradise Living, Inc., and Arthur Holdings, L.P. v. John M. Raborn


11th District Court of Harris County Trial court case number: 2020-13849

ORDER

APRIL FARRIS, JUDGE

On August 19, 2021, this appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution based on appellants, James P. Arthur, Mary Arthur, Legonite, Inc., Paradise Living, Inc., and Arthur Holdings, L.P., failure to pay, or make arrangements to pay, the fee for the preparation of the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

On August 24, 2021, appellants filed a motion for rehearing, stating that they paid the fee for the preparation of the clerk's record on June 2, 2021. Appellants' motion requests that we "reinstate the case" and allow the appeal to "be resolved on its merits." See Tex. R. App. P. 49.1.

Based on appellants' motion, the Court will consider granting rehearing. Accordingly, we request a response from appellee, John M. Raborn, to the motion for rehearing, filed on August 24, 2021. See Tex. R. App. P. 49.2 ("A motion [for rehearing] will not be granted unless a response has been filed or requested by the court."). Appellee's response, if any, is due within ten days of the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Arthur v. Raborn

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston
Sep 9, 2021
No. 01-21-00072-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Arthur v. Raborn

Case Details

Full title:James P. Arthur, Mary Arthur, Legonite, Inc., Paradise Living, Inc., and…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston

Date published: Sep 9, 2021

Citations

No. 01-21-00072-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 9, 2021)