From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arthur v. Martin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jun 12, 2012
3:11-cv-00804-HDM-WGC (D. Nev. Jun. 12, 2012)

Opinion

3:11-cv-00804-HDM-WGC

06-12-2012

GEORGE ARTHUR, Plaintiff, v. DOCTOR MARTIN, et al., Defendants.


MINUTES OF THE COURT


PRESENT: THE HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DEPUTY CLERK: KATIE OGDEN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING

COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:

Before the Court is plaintiff's "Motion - Rule 37 - Failure to Make Disclosures, or to Cooperate in Discovery; Sanctions Motion, to Compel." (Doc. #33.)

The Scheduling Order has just been issued in this case (Doc. #32). Any "discovery" plaintiff attempted to serve before the discovery order was entered is void. Thus, any motion to compel at this juncture would be premature. Plaintiff should re-serve his discovery requests on defendants' counsel.

Plaintiff's motion (Doc. #33) is DENIED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK

By: _______________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Arthur v. Martin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jun 12, 2012
3:11-cv-00804-HDM-WGC (D. Nev. Jun. 12, 2012)
Case details for

Arthur v. Martin

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE ARTHUR, Plaintiff, v. DOCTOR MARTIN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jun 12, 2012

Citations

3:11-cv-00804-HDM-WGC (D. Nev. Jun. 12, 2012)