From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ARTHUR v. FINN

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 27, 2008
No. 2:07-cv-02096-MCE-JFM P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2008)

Opinion

No. 2:07-cv-02096-MCE-JFM P.

February 27, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On January 24, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 24, 2008, are adopted in full; and

2. Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed for failure to exhaust state remedies.


Summaries of

ARTHUR v. FINN

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 27, 2008
No. 2:07-cv-02096-MCE-JFM P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2008)
Case details for

ARTHUR v. FINN

Case Details

Full title:LATRAYL ARTHUR, Petitioner, v. CLAUDE E. FINN, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 27, 2008

Citations

No. 2:07-cv-02096-MCE-JFM P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2008)