From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arthur Pile Found. Corp. v. Bonwit Constr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 2, 1965
23 A.D.2d 540 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)

Opinion

February 2, 1965


Order, entered on December 2, 1964, denying the motion of defendant Bonwit Construction Co., Inc., for leave to amend its counterclaim by increasing the ad damnum clause from $103,633.66 to $189,784.93, unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts and in the exercise of discretion by granting defendant's motion to increase the ad damnum clause in its counterclaim on condition that the said defendant Bonwit Construction Co., Inc., pay a full bill of costs in the action to date and $30 costs and disbursements of this appeal to plaintiff-respondent within 10 days after taxing of the bill of costs and, as so modified, affirmed. The defendant served its bill of particulars on plaintiff in September, 1961 and specifically set forth its claims of damage in the total amount of $189,784.93, the amount presently sought to be set forth in the ad damnum clause in its counterclaim by the proposed amendment. Although defendant may have delayed in making formal application for change of the ad damnum clause, said delay was not prejudicial to the rights of the plaintiff.

Concur — Breitel, J.P., Rabin, Valente, Stevens and Staley, JJ.


Summaries of

Arthur Pile Found. Corp. v. Bonwit Constr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 2, 1965
23 A.D.2d 540 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)
Case details for

Arthur Pile Found. Corp. v. Bonwit Constr

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR PILE FOUNDATION CORP., Respondent, v. BONWIT CONSTRUCTION CO.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 2, 1965

Citations

23 A.D.2d 540 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)

Citing Cases

Ciunci v. Wella Corp.

Since plaintiff had full knowledge of the proposed defense, it cannot be seriously urged, in our opinion,…