Summary
holding that a proof of claim filed in one bankruptcy case against a corporation could not be deemed to have been filed in a bankruptcy case involving a subsidiary of the corporation
Summary of this case from Liakas v. Creditors' Committee, of Deja Vu, Inc.Opinion
No. 179, Docket 27761.
Argued January 9, 1963.
Decided January 11, 1963.
Appeal from an order of Sylvester J. Ryan, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, affirming an order of the referee in bankruptcy which denied appellant's motion for leave to file an amended proof of claim.
Affirmed per curiam.
Dunnington, Bartholow Miller, New York City (Charles G. Pillon, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
David W. Kahn, New York City, for appellee.
Before CLARK, KAUFMAN and HAYS, Circuit Judges.
We affirm the judgment of the district court in favor of the trustee in bankruptcy and against Arthur Andersen Co., the purported claimant, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Chief Judge Ryan, In re Chemo Puro Mfg. Corp., D.C.S.D.N.Y., 213 F. Supp. 845.