From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arther v. Fikes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 28, 2012
3:12-cv-00233-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Nov. 28, 2012)

Opinion

3:12-cv-00233-LRH-VPC

11-28-2012

GEORGE ARTHER, Plaintiff, v. FIKES, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke (#24) entered on August 20, 2012, recommending denying Plaintiff's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and for Preliminary Injunction (#12, #13), filed on June 27, 2012. Plaintiff filed his Motion for "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation" (#27) on September 6, 2012. Defendants did not file a response. This matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 1B 1-4 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.

Refers to court's docket number.

The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the objections of the Plaintiff, the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1) (B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#24) entered on August 20, 2012, should be adopted and accepted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#24) entered on August 20, 2012, is adopted and accepted, and Plaintiff's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and for Preliminary Injunction (#12, #13), are DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

___________

LARRY R. HICKS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Arther v. Fikes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 28, 2012
3:12-cv-00233-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Nov. 28, 2012)
Case details for

Arther v. Fikes

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE ARTHER, Plaintiff, v. FIKES, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Nov 28, 2012

Citations

3:12-cv-00233-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Nov. 28, 2012)