From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arther v. Board of Parole Hearings

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 7, 2008
No. CIV S-07-2120 LEW DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-2120 LEW DAD P.

January 7, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an amended petitioner for a writ of habeas corpus, has requested appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's December 20, 2007 request for appointment of counsel is denied.


Summaries of

Arther v. Board of Parole Hearings

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 7, 2008
No. CIV S-07-2120 LEW DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2008)
Case details for

Arther v. Board of Parole Hearings

Case Details

Full title:LATRAYL D. ARTHER, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 7, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-07-2120 LEW DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2008)