From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arther v. Board of Parole Hearings

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 16, 2008
No. CIV S-07-2120 LEW DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-2120 LEW DAD P.

January 16, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On December 6, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 6, 2007, are adopted in full; and

2. Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and failure to exhaust state remedies.


Summaries of

Arther v. Board of Parole Hearings

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 16, 2008
No. CIV S-07-2120 LEW DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2008)
Case details for

Arther v. Board of Parole Hearings

Case Details

Full title:LATRAYL D. ARTHER, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 16, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-07-2120 LEW DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2008)