From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arterberry v. Lizarraga

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 28, 2016
NO. CV 15-1061 JFW (KS) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2016)

Opinion

NO. CV 15-1061 JFW (KS)

01-28-2016

RASHEEN ARTBERRY, Petitioner, v. JOE LIZARRAGA, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ("Petition"), all of the records herein, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and Petitioner's vague and conclusory Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ("Objections"). Having completed its review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. \\ \\ \\ \\ \\

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition is DENIED; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. DATED: January 28, 2016

/s/_________

JOHN F. WALTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Arterberry v. Lizarraga

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 28, 2016
NO. CV 15-1061 JFW (KS) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2016)
Case details for

Arterberry v. Lizarraga

Case Details

Full title:RASHEEN ARTERBERRY, Petitioner, v. JOE LIZARRAGA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 28, 2016

Citations

NO. CV 15-1061 JFW (KS) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2016)