From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Artco v. Phillips

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 5, 1957
98 So. 2d 398 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1957)

Opinion

No. 57-76.

November 5, 1957.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Ray Pearson, J.

Robert C. Lane, Miami, for appellant.

Friedman Shapiro, Miami, for appellees David P. Phillips and Brytha Mae Phillips.

Arthur J. August, Miami, for appellees Aron Farber and Joyce Farber.

Martin Lemlich, Miami, for appellee Martin Lemlich, as Trustee.

W.F. Parker, Miami, for appellee the Clemons Corp.


This cause came on to be heard on the joint motion of the appellees to affirm the Amended Order Confirming Sale Nunc Pro Tunc appealed from pursuant to Rule 3.9, subd. (c) of the rules of this Court, and it appearing to the Court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;

It is accordingly Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the motion to affirm the amended order confirming sale nunc pro tunc appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the order is

Affirmed.

CARROLL, CHAS., C.J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Artco v. Phillips

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 5, 1957
98 So. 2d 398 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1957)
Case details for

Artco v. Phillips

Case Details

Full title:ARTCO, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. DAVID P. PHILLIPS AND…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Nov 5, 1957

Citations

98 So. 2d 398 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1957)