From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arsich v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 9, 2012
CIVIL NO. 11-2046-GGH (E.D. Cal. Feb. 9, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 11-2046-GGH

02-09-2012

CHRISTOPHER ALLAN ARSICH, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney SUNDEEP R. PATEL Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Defendant CERNEY KREUZE & LOTT, LLP *Via e-mail authorization on 02-9-2012 ANN M. CERNEY Attorney for Plaintiff


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

DONNA L. CALVERT

Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

Social Security Administration

SUNDEEP R. PATEL, CSBN 242284

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant

STIPULATION TO VOLUNTARY REMAND

PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) AND TO ENTRY OF JUDGMENT

IT IS STIPULATED by and between plaintiff Christopher Allan Arsich ("Plaintiff") and defendant Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security ("Defendant"), through their undersigned counsel of record, that the above-entitled action shall be remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative proceedings.

Upon remand, the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review will remand the case to an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) and direct him to: (1) update the treatment evidence on the claimant's medical condition; (2) expressly evaluate medical source opinions of consultative examiner, Dr. Aquino, D.O., and State agency non-examining physician, Dr. Dann, M.D., and explain the reasons for the weight he gives to this opinion evidence; (3) further consider the claimant's residual functional capacity on the updated record, citing specific evidence in support of the assessed limitations; (4) further consider whether the claimant has past relevant work he could perform with the limitations established by the evidence; and (5) as appropriate, secure supplemental evidence from a vocational expert to clarify the effect of the assessed limitations on the claimant's occupational base. This stipulation constitutes a remand under the fourth sentence of Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).

Respectfully submitted,

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By ____________

SUNDEEP R. PATEL

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for Defendant

CERNEY KREUZE & LOTT, LLP

By ____________

*Via e-mail authorization on 02-9-2012

ANN M. CERNEY

Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER

APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.

Gregory G. Hollows

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Arsich v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 9, 2012
CIVIL NO. 11-2046-GGH (E.D. Cal. Feb. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Arsich v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER ALLAN ARSICH, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 9, 2012

Citations

CIVIL NO. 11-2046-GGH (E.D. Cal. Feb. 9, 2012)