Opinion
22295-22
10-31-2022
HASSEEB ARSHAD & ASMAA MUAZZAM, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
ORDER
Kathleen Kerrigan, Chief Judge.
It has come to the Court's attention that the Petition filed in this case on October 6, 2022, was not properly executed in that it does not bear the original signature of petitioner Asmaa Muazzam of a practitioner admitted to practice before this Court. The foregoing considered, it is
ORDERED that petitioner Asmaa Muazzam shall, on or before November 28, 2022, file with the Court in paper form (not electronic) a Ratification of Petition bearing an original signature (not a photocopy), preferably in blue ink, in which petitioner states, if such be the case, that Asmaa Muazzam read the petition filed on, and ratify and affirms the filing of said document. It is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to attach to the copy of this Order served on petitioners a form which may be used by petitioner Asmaa Muazzam for purposes of ratifying the petition.
RATIFICATION OF PETITION
____, have read the Petition filed with the Court on ________ and do hereby ratify and affirm the filing of said document by affixing my signature hereto.