From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arruda v. Charles

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 2nd, 11th, & 13th Judicial Districts
Jun 24, 2013
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 78797 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

Motion No: 2012-01456 qc

06-24-2013

Julio Arruda, Appellant, v. Mateo Charles and Chichba Homes Realty, Respondents, and Ricardo Salazar, Defendant.


, J.P.

MICHAEL L. PESCE

THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Appeal from so much of an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County, entered April 4, 2011, as denied the branch of appellant's motion seeking, in effect, to set aside a decision after trial.

On the court's own motion, it is

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed on the ground that no appeal lies from an order denying a motion to set aside a decision (see Preferred Group of Manhattan, Inc. v Fabius Maximus, Inc., 51 AD3d 889 [2008]; Behrens v Behrens, 143 AD2d 617 [1988]).

ENTER:

Paul Kenny

Chief Clerk


Summaries of

Arruda v. Charles

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 2nd, 11th, & 13th Judicial Districts
Jun 24, 2013
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 78797 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Arruda v. Charles

Case Details

Full title:Julio Arruda, Appellant, v. Mateo Charles and Chichba Homes Realty…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 2nd, 11th, & 13th Judicial Districts

Date published: Jun 24, 2013

Citations

2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 78797 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)