From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arroyo v. S.M. Broadway Corp.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 17, 2021
20-cv-09007-DMR (N.D. Cal. Sep. 17, 2021)

Opinion

20-cv-09007-DMR

09-17-2021

RAFAEL ARROYO, Plaintiff, v. S.M. BROADWAY CORP., Defendant.


ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE

Donna M. Ryu Judge

Plaintiff Rafael Arroyo alleges that Defendant S.M. Broadway Corp. violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. and California's Unruh Civil Rights Act, Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51-53. Defendant filed a motion to dismiss, which is currently pending. [Docket No. 15]. At issue in this case is the scope of the regulations implementing the ADA, specifically with respect to reservations systems for lodging facilities. See 28 C.F.R. § 36.302(e)(1)(i), 28 C.F.R. § 36.302(e)(1)(ii). Those regulations are collectively referred to as the “Reservations Rule.” The Ninth Circuit has yet to interpret the Reservations Rule, but appeals are currently pending in at least two cases. See Love v. Marriott Hotel Srvcs., Inc., No. 20-cv-07137-TSH, 2021 WL 810252 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 3, 2021), appeal docketed, No. 21-15458 (9th Cir. Mar. 15, 2021); Garcia v. Gateway Hotel L.P., No. CV 20-10752 PA (GJSx), 2021 WL 936176 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 25, 2021), appeal docketed, No. 21-55227 (9th Cir. Mar. 10, 2021). As the cases on appeal squarely concern the issues raised in Plaintiff's complaint, on September 3, 2021, the court issued an Order to Show Cause why this action should not be stayed pending a Ninth Circuit ruling in one or more of the foregoing cases. [Docket No. 22.]

Plaintiff does not oppose a stay of the case pending the outcome of the Ninth Circuit appeals. [Docket No. 23.] Defendant did not respond to the Order to Show Cause. Therefore, the court sees no reason not to pause this litigation until the Ninth Circuit issues guidance.

For docketing reasons, rather than impose a stay, the court administratively closes this case. Either party may reopen this case by filing a notice within 14 days after the Ninth Circuit issues its first mandate in Love and/or Garcia, or any other currently pending Ninth Circuit appeal interpreting the Reservations Rule.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Arroyo v. S.M. Broadway Corp.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 17, 2021
20-cv-09007-DMR (N.D. Cal. Sep. 17, 2021)
Case details for

Arroyo v. S.M. Broadway Corp.

Case Details

Full title:RAFAEL ARROYO, Plaintiff, v. S.M. BROADWAY CORP., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Sep 17, 2021

Citations

20-cv-09007-DMR (N.D. Cal. Sep. 17, 2021)