From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arroll v. Buffalo, Lockport and Rochester Rail

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 1914
164 App. Div. 970 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)

Opinion

October, 1914.


Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Robson and Merrell, JJ., who dissented upon the ground that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence, and upon the further ground that the court committed reversible error in permitting the plaintiff to testify under defendant's objection that the defendant's claim agent, Hoenig, called upon him after the accident.


Summaries of

Arroll v. Buffalo, Lockport and Rochester Rail

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 1914
164 App. Div. 970 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)
Case details for

Arroll v. Buffalo, Lockport and Rochester Rail

Case Details

Full title:James T. Arroll, Respondent, v. Buffalo, Lockport and Rochester Railway…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1914

Citations

164 App. Div. 970 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)