From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arrington v. Va. Dep't of Corr.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 1, 2016
643 F. App'x 254 (4th Cir. 2016)

Opinion

No. 16-6068

04-01-2016

ALBERT J. ARRINGTON, Petitioner - Appellant, v. VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent - Appellee.

Albert J. Arrington, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:15-cv-01637-LMB-IDD) Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Albert J. Arrington, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Albert J. Arrington seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition without prejudice as successive. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Arrington has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

Arrington v. Va. Dep't of Corr.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 1, 2016
643 F. App'x 254 (4th Cir. 2016)
Case details for

Arrington v. Va. Dep't of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT J. ARRINGTON, Petitioner - Appellant, v. VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 1, 2016

Citations

643 F. App'x 254 (4th Cir. 2016)