From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arrington v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Dec 4, 1981
289 S.E.2d 324 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981)

Opinion

63104.

DECIDED DECEMBER 4, 1981.

Attempted burglary. Douglas Superior Court. Before Judge Fudger.

Michael R. Hauptman, for appellant.

William A. Foster III, District Attorney, Jeff Richards, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.


The appellant was indicted for burglary and found guilty of the lesser included offense of attempted burglary. He enumerates as error the denial of his demurrer to the indictment, contending that the description of the crime location is deficient. The indictment alleged the premises to be the "building housing Mitchell Appliance, located at 6340 E. Broad Street" in Douglas County, Georgia. It fails to allege that this location is also in Douglasville, as the evidence at trial proved. Held:

1. Code § 27-701 provides "[E]very indictment or accusation of the grand jury shall be deemed sufficiently technical and correct, which states the offense in the terms and language of this Code, or so plainly that the nature of the offense charged may be easily understood by the jury. `The requisite of a good indictment, as to form, is that the offense with which the defendant is charged be so stated as to give him ample opportunity to prepare his defense.' [Cits.]" State v. Green, 135 Ga. App. 622 ( 218 S.E.2d 456) (1975). The other requirement is that the defendant must be "protected against another prosecution for the same offense." Berger v. United States, 295 U.S. 78, 82 ( 55 SC 629, 79 LE 1314) (1935). See Price v. State, 142 Ga. App. 120 ( 235 S.E.2d 387) (1977) (reversed on other grounds). Tested against these standards, the description was sufficient, and the demurrer was properly overruled. Compare Askea v. State, 153 Ga. App. 849 (1) ( 267 S.E.2d 279) (1980).

2. The appellant also contends that the indictment is defective because it fails to name the victim of the crime. He relies upon Irwin v. State, 117 Ga. 722 ( 45 S.E. 59) (1903), which holds that the indictment should refer to the victim's name, if known, in crimes against the person. Burglary, of course, is a crime against property. Code § 26-1601.

Judgment affirmed. Deen, P. J., and Carley, J., concur.

DECIDED DECEMBER 4, 1981.


Summaries of

Arrington v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Dec 4, 1981
289 S.E.2d 324 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981)
Case details for

Arrington v. State

Case Details

Full title:ARRINGTON v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Dec 4, 1981

Citations

289 S.E.2d 324 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981)
289 S.E.2d 324

Citing Cases

Mobley v. State

Appellant has failed to demonstrate that he was unable to adequately prepare his defense to the charge of…

Vincent v. State

Dennard v. State, 243 Ga. App. 868, 877 (2) ( 534 SE2d 182) (2000).Arrington v. State, 160 Ga. App. 645, 646…