From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arrington v. Robertson

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
May 29, 1941
119 F.2d 1022 (3d Cir. 1941)

Opinion

No. 7655.

May 29, 1941.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; George A. Welsh, Judge.

Thomas E. Comber, Jr., of Philadelphia, Pa. (William H. James, of Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Louis S. Hankin, of Philadelphia, Pa. (B. Nathaniel Richter, of Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellees.

Before BIGGS, CLARK, and GOODRICH, Circuit Judges.


This is the second appeal in this litigation to this court. See Arrington v. Robertson, 3 Cir., 1940, 114 F.2d 821. We have examined the testimony herein fully and conclude that no substantial question is involved in this appeal and that we should not be justified in filling the space involved in printing the demonstration of that fact.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.


Summaries of

Arrington v. Robertson

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
May 29, 1941
119 F.2d 1022 (3d Cir. 1941)
Case details for

Arrington v. Robertson

Case Details

Full title:Seeta ARRINGTON and William Roy Arrington, Plaintiffs, v. Clinton K…

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: May 29, 1941

Citations

119 F.2d 1022 (3d Cir. 1941)