From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arrington v. Koon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
May 9, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:11-CV-308(MTT) (M.D. Ga. May. 9, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:11-CV-308(MTT)

05-09-2012

CEDRIC D. ARRINGTON, Petitioner, v. JACK KOON, Respondent.


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle. (Doc. 16). The Magistrate Judge recommends denying the Petitioner's Motion for Default Judgment. (Doc. 10).

The Petitioner moved for "summary judgment for default" alleging that the Respondent failed to file a timely response to the Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition, and, therefore, summary judgment should be entered in his favor pursuant to Rule 5 of the Rules governing section 2254 cases. The Magistrate Judge recommends denying the Petitioner's Motion because Rule 5 does not authorize default judgment or summary judgment in this case. The Petitioner did not file an objection to the Recommendation. The Court has thoroughly reviewed the Petitioner's Motion and the Recommendation. The Recommendation is adopted and made an order of this Court. The Petitioner's Motion is DENIED. (Doc. 10).

Further, on November 15, 2011, the day after the Petitioner filed his Motion, the Respondent submitted a Response and a Motion for Extension of time to file an out of time Response. (Docs. 11, 12). The Magistrate Judge granted both motions.

____________

MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Arrington v. Koon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
May 9, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:11-CV-308(MTT) (M.D. Ga. May. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Arrington v. Koon

Case Details

Full title:CEDRIC D. ARRINGTON, Petitioner, v. JACK KOON, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

Date published: May 9, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:11-CV-308(MTT) (M.D. Ga. May. 9, 2012)