From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arrington v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Oct 31, 2012
Case No. 12-10079 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 31, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 12-10079

10-31-2012

AMANDA ARRINGTON, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


Honorable Denise Page Hood


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

and

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 12, filed July 18, 2012]. To date, no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed and the time to file such objections has passed.

Judicial review of the Commissioner's decision is limited in scope to determining whether the Commissioner employed the proper legal criteria in reaching his conclusion. Garner v. Heckler, 745 F.2d 383 (6th Cir. 1984). The credibility findings of an administrative law judge ("ALJ") must not be discarded lightly and should be accorded great deference. Hardaway v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 823 F.2d 922, 928 (6th Cir. 1987). A district court's review of an ALJ's decision is not a de novo review. The district court may not resolve conflicts in the evidence nor decide questions of credibility. Garner, 745 F.2d at 397. The decision of the Commissioner must be upheld if supported by substantial evidence, even if the record might support a contrary decision or if the district court arrives at a different conclusion. Smith v. Secretary of HHS, 893 F.2d 106, 108 (6th Cir. 1984); Mullen v. Bowen, 800 F.2d 535, 545 (6th Cir. 1986) (quoting Baker v. Heckler, 730 F.2d 1147, 1150 (8th Cir. 1984)).

The Court has had an opportunity to review this matter and finds that the Magistrate Judge reached the correct conclusion for the proper reasons. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge that this matter must be dismissed under Rule 41(b) of the Rules of Civil Procedures for failure to prosecute with prejudice. A dismissal under Rule 41(b) "operates as an adjudication the merits." Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon [Doc. No. 12, filed July 18, 2012] is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as this Court's findings and conclusions of law.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice.

____________________

Denise Page Hood

United States District Judge
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on October 31, 2012, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

LaShawn R. Saulsberry

Case Manager


Summaries of

Arrington v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Oct 31, 2012
Case No. 12-10079 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 31, 2012)
Case details for

Arrington v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:AMANDA ARRINGTON, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 31, 2012

Citations

Case No. 12-10079 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 31, 2012)

Citing Cases

Damron v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Consequently, because it is the ALJ's duty to resolve conflicts in the medical evidence, and the ALJ…