From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arrington v. Chicago Ins. Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 7, 1982
412 So. 2d 57 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. 81-439.

April 7, 1982.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; R. William Rutter, Jr., Judge.

Robert V. Romani of Farish, Farish Romani, West Palm Beach, for appellants.

Christopher R. Fertig of Fertig Curtis, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, and David Wm. Boone of Law Offices of David Wm. Boone, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.


Appellants, plaintiffs in the court below, seek reversal of a judgment based upon an adverse jury verdict for defendant-appellants.

We have carefully considered appellants' contention that the trial court erred in refusing to grant appellants a new trial because the verdict was contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence. Unquestionably the verdict surprised appellants and the trial judge. Nevertheless, the trial judge felt, and we agree, that the issue was one for the jury's determination.

Accordingly, we find no demonstration of reversible error and affirm the judgment appealed from.

AFFIRMED.

DOWNEY and HERSEY, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Arrington v. Chicago Ins. Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 7, 1982
412 So. 2d 57 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

Arrington v. Chicago Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM ARRINGTON AND EDITH ARWOOD ARRINGTON, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS, v…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Apr 7, 1982

Citations

412 So. 2d 57 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)