From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arrington v. Chase

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division
Mar 27, 2006
5:05-cv-178 (CAR) (M.D. Ga. Mar. 27, 2006)

Opinion

5:05-cv-178 (CAR), Habeas Corpus 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

March 27, 2006


ORDER ON THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Before the Court is the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation [Doc. 18] that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 13] be granted. Through its motion, Respondent seeks dismissal of Petitioner's petition for habeas corpus on the grounds that Petitioner has failed to exhaust state remedies. The Magistrate Judge also recommended that Petitioner's petition for writ of mandamus on 13th Amendment grounds [Doc. 17] be denied for lack of a legal basis. Petitioner filed no Objection to the Recommendation. Having considered the matter, the Court agrees with the Recommendation. Accordingly, the Recommendation [Doc. 18] that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 13] be granted is hereby ADOPTED and MADE THE ORDER OF THE COURT.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Arrington v. Chase

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division
Mar 27, 2006
5:05-cv-178 (CAR) (M.D. Ga. Mar. 27, 2006)
Case details for

Arrington v. Chase

Case Details

Full title:DOUGLAS MAURICE ARRINGTON, Petitioner, v. ALEXIS CHASE, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division

Date published: Mar 27, 2006

Citations

5:05-cv-178 (CAR) (M.D. Ga. Mar. 27, 2006)