From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arringdale v. Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 1897
26 S.E. 1007 (N.C. 1897)

Opinion

(February Term, 1897.)

Broker — Negotiating Sale — Commissions.

A broker is not entitled to commissions on a sale unless he finds a purchaser in a situation and ready and willing to complete the purchase on the terms agreed upon between the broker and vendor.

ACTION, tried before Robinson, J., and a jury, at Fall Term, 1896, of HALIFAX. The cause of action was a claim for commissions for sale of real estate for defendant. The plaintiff was nonsuited and appealed.

Messrs. H. G. Connor and MacRae Day for appellant.

Messrs. T. N. Hill and David Bell for appellee.


There was not sufficient evidence to go to the jury. This case is governed by Mallonee v. Young, 119 N.C. 549.

Affirmed.

(489)


Summaries of

Arringdale v. Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 1897
26 S.E. 1007 (N.C. 1897)
Case details for

Arringdale v. Lumber Co.

Case Details

Full title:J. A. ARRINGDALE v. ENFIELD LUMBER COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Feb 1, 1897

Citations

26 S.E. 1007 (N.C. 1897)
120 N.C. 488

Citing Cases

Mallonee v. Young

AFFIRMED. Cited: Arrington v. Lumber Co., 120 N.C. 488; Abbott v. Hunt, 129 N.C. 405; Trust Co. v. Adams, 145…

Driller Co. v. Worth

Error. Cited: Collins v. Young, 118 N.C. 266; Taylor v. Smith, ib., 128; Driller Co. v. Worth, ib., 747;…