From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arrindell v. Moscati

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 1, 2013
09-CV-165S (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 1, 2013)

Opinion

09-CV-165S

03-01-2013

EUSTACE ARRINDELL, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Marguerite Arrindell, deceased, Plaintiff, v. RONALD MOSCATI, M.D., Defendant.


DECISION AND ORDER

There being no opposition thereto, Plaintiff's Motion to Remand to state court for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction will be granted and this case remanded to the New York State Supreme Court, County of Erie.

IT HEREBY IS ORDERED, that Plaintiff's unopposed Motion to Remand (Docket No. 118) is GRANTED.

FURTHER, that the Clerk of Court is directed to TRANSFER this case to the New York State Supreme Court, County of Erie.

FURTHER, that the Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case upon transfer to the New York State Supreme Court, County of Erie.

SO ORDERED. Dated: March 1, 2013

Buffalo, New York

_______________

WILLIAM M. SKRETNY

Chief Judge

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Arrindell v. Moscati

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 1, 2013
09-CV-165S (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 1, 2013)
Case details for

Arrindell v. Moscati

Case Details

Full title:EUSTACE ARRINDELL, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Mar 1, 2013

Citations

09-CV-165S (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 1, 2013)