From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arrendal v. Trizechahn Corp.

Court of Appeals of New York.
Apr 25, 2013
988 N.E.2d 517 (N.Y. 2013)

Opinion

2013-04-25

Julian ARRENDAL, Plaintiff, v. TRIZECHAHN CORPORATION et al., Defendants. Trizechahn Corporation, Third–Party Appellant, v. Subway Real Estate Corp., Third–Party Respondent. Subway Real Estate Corp., Third–Party Respondent, v. Kashif D. Creary, et al., Third–Party Respondents.


Reported below, 98 A.D.3d 701, 950 N.Y.S.2d 187.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.


Summaries of

Arrendal v. Trizechahn Corp.

Court of Appeals of New York.
Apr 25, 2013
988 N.E.2d 517 (N.Y. 2013)
Case details for

Arrendal v. Trizechahn Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Julian ARRENDAL, Plaintiff, v. TRIZECHAHN CORPORATION et al., Defendants…

Court:Court of Appeals of New York.

Date published: Apr 25, 2013

Citations

988 N.E.2d 517 (N.Y. 2013)
21 N.Y.3d 894
965 N.Y.S.2d 781
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 71629