Arreguin v. Keisler

Full title: Juan M. ARREGUIN, Petitioner, v. Peter D. KEISLER, Acting Attorney…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Oct 18, 2007

251 F. App'x 426 (9th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 05-74561.

Submitted October 16, 2007.^__

__ The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed October 18, 2007.

Meredith N. Landy, Esq., Dhaivat Shah, Esq., O'Melveny Myers LLP, Menlo Park, CA, for Petitioner.

Juan M. Arreguin, San Jose, CA, pro se.

Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Linda S. Wendtland, Esq., Edward C. Durant, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Agency No. A74-421-202.

Before: ROTH^___, THOMAS, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

___ The Honorable Jane R. Roth, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Third Circuit, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER^____

____ This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Pursuant to the request of the Attorney General, we remand this Petition for Review to the Board of Immigration Appeals for reconsideration in light of this Court's decision in Chaidez v. Gonzales, 486 F.3d 1079 (9th Cir. 2007).

REMANDED.