From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arredondo v. Peshastin Hi-Up Growers

United States District Court, Eastern District of Washington
Nov 13, 2023
2:23-CV-0235-TOR (E.D. Wash. Nov. 13, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-CV-0235-TOR

11-13-2023

MIRIAM PENA ARREDONDO, Plaintiff, v. PESHASTIN HI-UP GROWERS, a Washington cooperative association, Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

THOMAS O. RICE, United States District Judge.

BEFORE THE COURT is the parties' Stipulation of Dismissal with According to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), a plaintiff may dismiss an action by filing a stipulation signed by all parties who have appeared.

Prejudice. ECF No. 9. The parties stipulate and that this action should be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The Court has reviewed the record and files herein and is fully informed.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and the parties' stipulation, this action is DISMISSED with prejudice.
2. All deadlines and hearings are VACATED.

The District Court Executive is directed to enter this Order and Judgment of Dismissal, furnish copies to counsel, and CLOSE the file.


Summaries of

Arredondo v. Peshastin Hi-Up Growers

United States District Court, Eastern District of Washington
Nov 13, 2023
2:23-CV-0235-TOR (E.D. Wash. Nov. 13, 2023)
Case details for

Arredondo v. Peshastin Hi-Up Growers

Case Details

Full title:MIRIAM PENA ARREDONDO, Plaintiff, v. PESHASTIN HI-UP GROWERS, a Washington…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Washington

Date published: Nov 13, 2023

Citations

2:23-CV-0235-TOR (E.D. Wash. Nov. 13, 2023)