From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arp v. Riley

Supreme Court of Washington.
Jun 1, 2016
377 P.3d 722 (Wash. 2016)

Opinion

NO. 92780–4

06-01-2016

Benjamin C. Arp, Respondent, v. James H. Riley, et ux., and Sierra Construction Co., Inc, Petitioners.


ORDER

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justices Owens, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its May 31, 2016, Motion Calendar, whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the Petition for Review is denied.

For the Court

/s/ Madsen, C.J.

CHIEF JUSTICE


Summaries of

Arp v. Riley

Supreme Court of Washington.
Jun 1, 2016
377 P.3d 722 (Wash. 2016)
Case details for

Arp v. Riley

Case Details

Full title:Benjamin C. Arp, Respondent, v. James H. Riley, et ux., and Sierra…

Court:Supreme Court of Washington.

Date published: Jun 1, 2016

Citations

377 P.3d 722 (Wash. 2016)
185 Wash. 2d 1031
185 Wn. 2d 1031