From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aros v. Ryan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Sep 11, 2012
No. CV -09-320-TUC-JGZ (CRP) (D. Ariz. Sep. 11, 2012)

Opinion

No. CV -09-320-TUC-JGZ (CRP)

09-11-2012

Frederico Aros, Petitioner, v. Charles L. Ryan, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Charles R. Pyle that recommends denying Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Doc. 20.)

A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence.

The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Pyle's recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir.1999); see also Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F.Supp.2d 1203, 1204 (D.Or.1998).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

(1) Magistrate Judge Pyle's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 20) is accepted and adopted.
(2) Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED.
(3) This case is dismissed with prejudice.
(4) The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly.

______________

Jennifer G. Zipps

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Aros v. Ryan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Sep 11, 2012
No. CV -09-320-TUC-JGZ (CRP) (D. Ariz. Sep. 11, 2012)
Case details for

Aros v. Ryan

Case Details

Full title:Frederico Aros, Petitioner, v. Charles L. Ryan, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: Sep 11, 2012

Citations

No. CV -09-320-TUC-JGZ (CRP) (D. Ariz. Sep. 11, 2012)