From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aroche v. ST

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 23, 2010
43 So. 3d 159 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

Opinion

No. 3D09-3027.

September 1, 2010. Rehearing Denied September 23, 2010.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Nushin Sayfie, Judge.

Manuel J. Aroche, in proper person.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before COPE, ROTHENBERG, and SALTER, J J.


This is an appeal of an order denying a motion to correct illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Defendant-appellant Aroche maintains that counts five and six, second-degree felony murder, should not have been enhanced to life felonies on account of possession of a weapon or firearm. See § 775.087, Fla. Stat. (1993). Assuming no procedural bar, but see Chanquet v. State, 646 So.2d 834 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994), the rules have changed. The defendant relies on State v. Overfelt, 457 So.2d 1385 (Fla. 1984), and its progeny. However, in 2007, the Supreme Court announced Galindez v. State, 955 So.2d 517, 522-23 (Fla. 2007), which holds that where an interrogatory verdict is insufficient under Overfelt, the error is subject to harmless error analysis. Having taken judicial notice of the briefs from the defendant's direct appeal of judgment and sentence, there was evidence before the jury that the defendant was in possession of a weapon during the charged crimes. The defendant's claims were properly denied.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Aroche v. ST

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 23, 2010
43 So. 3d 159 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)
Case details for

Aroche v. ST

Case Details

Full title:Manuel J. AROCHE, Appellant, v. The ST of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Sep 23, 2010

Citations

43 So. 3d 159 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)