From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arnold v. Williams

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County
Apr 15, 1959
17 Misc. 2d 953 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1959)

Opinion

April 15, 1959

Benjamin E. Lander for plaintiffs.

Thomas J. Flood for defendants.


Motion by plaintiff to vacate notice of examination before trial before a notary public (1) of infant plaintiff because of his tender age, and (2) his guardian ad litem because she is not the proper party to be examined, and cross motion by defendant for such examination. The infant will attain the age of seven on April 19. His guardian ad litem contends that since he is incapable of being sworn before a notary, his examination should be barred.

There is no fixed age limit as to an infant's competency as a witness. That question is sui generis in each case ( Blagburn v. Milrita Realty Corp., 204 Misc. 74; Palmieri v. Salsimo Realty Co., 202 Misc. 251). The court must pursue more than perfunctory procedures before an infant's testimony will be compelled. Examination of the plaintiff herein before a notary public would accordingly be improper since his competency to testify could not be determined by proper authority nor is there any assurance that safeguards would be taken for his protection (see Alsante v. Roberts, 118 N.Y.S.2d 683; Jones v. Jones, 17 Misc.2d 1076).

Regarding the examination of the guardian ad litem, it is clear that while appearance by a guardian may be necessary, the infant still remains the real party in interest (Civ. Prac. Act, § 202; Merritt v. Greenberg, 4 F. Supp. 655), and it is improper to examine the guardian ad litem as a party (Civ. Prac. Act, § 288; Alsante v. Roberts, supra). However, the guardian ad litem here is also suing in her individual capacity. An examination limited to her claim would, therefore, be appropriate.

Motion and cross motion are accordingly disposed of as follows: Let the infant plaintiff attend at Special Term, Part II of this court on April 27, 1959 at 10:00 A.M. for a determination by the court as to his examination. Examination before trial of the guardian ad litem is granted only insofar as to her individual claim. Unless otherwise stipulated, let this examination take place on April 27, 1959 pursuant to the original notice but at Special Term, Part II.


Summaries of

Arnold v. Williams

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County
Apr 15, 1959
17 Misc. 2d 953 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1959)
Case details for

Arnold v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:DOROTHY M. ARNOLD, as Guardian ad Litem of DON D. ARNOLD, an Infant, et…

Court:Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County

Date published: Apr 15, 1959

Citations

17 Misc. 2d 953 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1959)
187 N.Y.S.2d 691

Citing Cases

Scharlack v. Richmond Memorial Hospital

We conclude that defendants may not obtain pretrial disclosure of aspects of the medical history and records…

Michels v. McCrory Corp.

(a) As to the guardian ad litem, the fact that he is a resident is irrelevant. Under New York law it was the…