From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arnold v. Sullivan Cnty. Jail

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Mar 21, 2022
2:22-CV-00012-JRG-CRW (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 21, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-CV-00012-JRG-CRW

03-21-2022

BRIAN EDWARD ARNOLD, Plaintiff, v. SULLIVAN COUNTY JAIL and JEFF CAS SIDY, Defendants.


JUDGMENT ORDER

J. RONNIE GREER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

For the reasons set forth in the memorandum opinion filed herewith:

1. Plaintiffs motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. 4] is GRANTED;

2. Plaintiff is ASSESSED the civil filing fee of $350.00;

3. The custodian of Plaintiff s inmate trust account is DIRECTED to submit the filing fee to the Clerk in the manner set forth in the accompanying memorandum opinion;

4. The Clerk is DIRECTED to provide a copy of the memorandum opinion and this order to the custodian of inmate accounts at the institution where Plaintiff is now confined and the Court's financial deputy;

5. Even liberally construing the complaint in favor of Plaintiff, it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under § 1983;

6. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A;

7. Because the Court CERTIFIED in the memorandum opinion that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, should Plaintiff file a notice of appeal, he is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24; and

8. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file.

So ordered.


Summaries of

Arnold v. Sullivan Cnty. Jail

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Mar 21, 2022
2:22-CV-00012-JRG-CRW (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 21, 2022)
Case details for

Arnold v. Sullivan Cnty. Jail

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN EDWARD ARNOLD, Plaintiff, v. SULLIVAN COUNTY JAIL and JEFF CAS SIDY…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee

Date published: Mar 21, 2022

Citations

2:22-CV-00012-JRG-CRW (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 21, 2022)