From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arnold v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Mar 28, 2006
187 S.W.3d 342 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. ED 86581.

March 28, 2006.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County; Barbara W. Wallace, Judge.

Steven W. Arnold, Pollock, LA, for appellant.

Shaun J. Mackelprang, Evan J. Buchheim, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., P.J., GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.


ORDER


Steven Arnold (hereinafter, "Arnold") appeals from the trial court's judgment denying and dismissing his Rule 74.06 and/or in the alternative Rule 29.07(d) motion seeking relief from a judgment and to correct a manifest injustice by setting aside his guilty plea from 1976. Arnold raises five claims of error on appeal.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the trial court's decision was not in error. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Arnold v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Mar 28, 2006
187 S.W.3d 342 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Arnold v. State

Case Details

Full title:Steven W. ARNOLD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Mar 28, 2006

Citations

187 S.W.3d 342 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006)

Citing Cases

State v. Arnold

In 2005, Defendant filed a motion pursuant to Rule 74.06 and/or in the alternative, Rule 29.07(d), which the…