Arnold v. State

7 Citing cases

  1. Seals v. State

    358 Ga. App. 783 (Ga. Ct. App. 2021)   Cited 2 times

    (Citations omitted.) Arnold v. State , 262 Ga. App. 61 (1), 584 S.E.2d 662 (2003), citing Jackson v. Virginia , 443 U. S. 307, 319-320 (III) (B), 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), Ellis v. State , 257 Ga. App. 409, 411 (3), 571 S.E.2d 198 (2002). "Under this review, we must put aside any questions about conflicting evidence, the credibility of witnesses, or the weight of the evidence, leaving the resolution of such things to the discretion of the trier of fact."

  2. Nails v. State

    357 Ga. App. 515 (Ga. Ct. App. 2020)   Cited 2 times

    (Citations omitted.) Arnold v. State , 262 Ga. App. 61 (1), 584 S.E.2d 662 (2003), citing Jackson v. Virginia , 443 U. S. 307, 319-320 (III) (B). 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), and Ellis v. State , 257 Ga. App. 409, 411 (3), 571 S.E.2d 198 (2002).So viewed, the record shows that on November 25, 2018, a patrol officer saw a Dodge Charger make an abrupt lane change that caused another motorist to hit the brakes and honk the horn.

  3. Cawthon v. State

    350 Ga. App. 741 (Ga. Ct. App. 2019)   Cited 21 times
    Noting that "this Court will not typically address arguments in the complete absence of record and transcript citations"

    Guilford , 296 Ga. App. at 504, 675 S.E.2d 247 (punctuation omitted); accord Fleming v. Advanced Stores Co. , 301 Ga. App. 734, 735, 688 S.E.2d 414 (2009).See, e.g. , Paden v. Rudd , 294 Ga. App. 603, 604 (1), 669 S.E.2d 548 (2008) (exercising discretion to consider the merits of an appeal when, although the appellant failed to provide proper record citations in her brief, the record was fairly small and the appellees provided sufficient record citations); Arnold v. State , 262 Ga. App. 61, 61 (1), 584 S.E.2d 662 (2003) (exercising discretion to consider merits of a challenge to sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction even though the appellant abandoned that claim by, inter alia , failing to cite to the record or legal authority).Brittain v. State , 329 Ga. App. 689, 693 (2), 766 S.E.2d 106 (2014) (punctuation omitted); accord Adams v. State , 322 Ga. App. 782, 784 (1), 746 S.E.2d 261 (2013).

  4. Anderson v. State

    335 Ga. App. 78 (Ga. Ct. App. 2015)   Cited 8 times

    (Citation, punctuation and footnote omitted.) Arnold v. State, 262 Ga. App. 61 (1) (584 SE2d 662 ) (2003); see also Court of Appeals Rule 25 (c) (1) (“The sequence of arguments in the briefs shall follow the order of the enumeration of errors, and shall be numbered accordingly”).

  5. Branton v. State

    663 S.E.2d 414 (Ga. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 1 times

    See OCGA § 16-7-24 (a). See Arnold v. State, 262 Ga. App. 61, 61-62 (1) ( 584 SE2d 662) (2003). (c) Branton also challenges the sufficiency of the evidence for his conviction for obstructing an officer.

  6. Knox v. State

    290 Ga. App. 49 (Ga. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 13 times

    Thus, the evidence showing that Knox collided with that patrol car was sufficient to allow the jury to find the essential elements of the crime charged. See Arnold v. State, 262 Ga. App. 61, 61 ( 584 SE2d 662) (2003); Fields v. State, 167 Ga. App. 400, 401-402 (2) ( 306 SE2d 695) (1983). For the reasons set forth above, we affirm the trial court's order denying Knox's motion for a new trial.

  7. Gardner v. State

    657 S.E.2d 288 (Ga. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 11 times
    Deeming as abandoned claims of error not supported by citation to the record, citation of authority or argument

    (Citation, punctuation and footnote omitted.) Arnold v. State, 262 Ga. App. 61 (1) ( 584 SE2d 662) (2003). See id.; Powles v. State, 248 Ga. App. 4 ( 545 SE2d 153) (2001).