Arnold v. State

Full title: DILAN EDWARD ARNOLD, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court: DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: May 22, 2020

295 So. 3d 1250 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 5D18-2673

05-22-2020

Dilan Edward ARNOLD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Andrew Mich, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pamela J. Koller, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Andrew Mich, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pamela J. Koller, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders ¹ appeal, we affirm Dilan Edward Arnold's conviction and sentence. We remand with directions that the trial court enter a written order finding Arnold competent to proceed nunc pro tunc to when the trial court made its oral finding of competency. See Smith v. State , 967 So. 2d 1002, 1002 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007).

1

AFFIRMED and REMANDED with directions.

EDWARDS, GROSSHANS and TRAVER, JJ., concur.

Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).