From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arnold v. Schwall

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Nov 15, 2024
No. A25E0039 (Ga. Ct. App. Nov. 15, 2024)

Opinion

A25E0039

11-15-2024

DEANDRE ARNOLD v. THE HONORABLE CRAIG SCHWALL, JUDGE et al.


The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

The petitioner's motion for an emergency writ of mandamus does not include the required filing fee or a sufficient affidavit of indigency per OCGA § 5-6-4 and Court of Appeals Rule 5.

While in some instances OCGA 9-1-1 allows an unsworn declaration to substitute for a notarized document, the petitioner's unsworn declaration does not meet the statutory requirements as to form and content pursuant to OCGA § 9-1-1 (f).

Accordingly, the motion is hereby DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Arnold v. Schwall

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Nov 15, 2024
No. A25E0039 (Ga. Ct. App. Nov. 15, 2024)
Case details for

Arnold v. Schwall

Case Details

Full title:DEANDRE ARNOLD v. THE HONORABLE CRAIG SCHWALL, JUDGE et al.

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Nov 15, 2024

Citations

No. A25E0039 (Ga. Ct. App. Nov. 15, 2024)