Opinion
A25E0039
11-15-2024
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
The petitioner's motion for an emergency writ of mandamus does not include the required filing fee or a sufficient affidavit of indigency per OCGA § 5-6-4 and Court of Appeals Rule 5.
While in some instances OCGA 9-1-1 allows an unsworn declaration to substitute for a notarized document, the petitioner's unsworn declaration does not meet the statutory requirements as to form and content pursuant to OCGA § 9-1-1 (f).
Accordingly, the motion is hereby DISMISSED.