From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arnold v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jul 28, 2022
No. 37893-21S (U.S.T.C. Jul. 28, 2022)

Opinion

37893-21S

07-28-2022

HENRY H. ARNOLD & PAULINE R. ARNOLD, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER

Kathleen Kerrigan, Chief Judge.

On July 21, 2022, the Court received from the parties in the above-docketed matter a Proposed Stipulated Decision resolving this litigation. That decision was premised on a Settlement Stipulation filed the same date establishing an overpayment for the underlying 2018 taxable year. However, review shows that the Proposed Stipulated Decision appears to reflect an increased deficiency that has never been appropriately pled or otherwise expressly stipulated by the parties. The Court would expect a stipulation to that effect to be included below the intended judicial signature. Merely showing the larger amount on a Statement of Account is insufficient.

The premises considered, and for cause, it is

ORDERED that the Proposed Stipulated Decision and Settlement Stipulation, both filed July 21, 2022, are hereby deemed stricken from the Court's record in this case.


Summaries of

Arnold v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jul 28, 2022
No. 37893-21S (U.S.T.C. Jul. 28, 2022)
Case details for

Arnold v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:HENRY H. ARNOLD & PAULINE R. ARNOLD, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Jul 28, 2022

Citations

No. 37893-21S (U.S.T.C. Jul. 28, 2022)