From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arnold v. Boyce

Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc
Oct 17, 1929
124 So. 61 (Fla. 1929)

Opinion

Decision filed October 17, 1929.

A Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for St. Johns County.

H. A. Henderson, Hilburn Merriday, J. J. Canon and A. H. Odom, for Plaintiff in Error; Fred H. Davis, Attorney General, and Roy Campbell, Assistant, for Defendant in Error.


This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

TERRELL, C. J., AND WHITFIELD, ELLIS, STRUM, BROWN AND BUFORD, J. J., concur.


Summaries of

Arnold v. Boyce

Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc
Oct 17, 1929
124 So. 61 (Fla. 1929)
Case details for

Arnold v. Boyce

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM H. ARNOLD, Plaintiff in Error, v. E. E. BOYCE, as Sheriff of St…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc

Date published: Oct 17, 1929

Citations

124 So. 61 (Fla. 1929)
124 So. 61