From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arnold v. Angelozzi

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION
Feb 4, 2014
No. 1:13-cv-302-SU (D. Or. Feb. 4, 2014)

Opinion

No. 1:13-cv-302-SU

02-04-2014

BRIAN PATRICK ARNOLD, Petitioner, v. RICK ANGELOZZI, Respondent.


ORDER

PANNER, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Patricia Sullivan filed Findings and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Although no objections have been filed, this court reviews legal principles novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (8th Cir. 1983).

In this petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, petitioner challenges his conviction for second-degree robbery. I agree with the Findings and Recommendation that the petition must be dismissed because petitioner procedurally defaulted on his claims. Petitioner has not shown cause or prejudice for his default, or a fundamental miscarriage of justice. I adopt the Findings and Recommendation.

CONCLUSION

Magistrate Judge Sullivan's Findings and Recommendation (#17) is adopted. The petition (#2) is dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________

OWEN M. PANNER

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Arnold v. Angelozzi

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION
Feb 4, 2014
No. 1:13-cv-302-SU (D. Or. Feb. 4, 2014)
Case details for

Arnold v. Angelozzi

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN PATRICK ARNOLD, Petitioner, v. RICK ANGELOZZI, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION

Date published: Feb 4, 2014

Citations

No. 1:13-cv-302-SU (D. Or. Feb. 4, 2014)