From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arnold v. Afflerbach

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 26, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-cv-5742 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 26, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-cv-5742

03-26-2012

MARC ANTHONY JAMES ARNOLD, Plaintiff, v. NANCY L. AFFLERBACH, CAROL SOMMERS, JAMES BLOOM, and DALE MEISEL, Defendants.


ORDER

AND NOW, this 22nd day of March, 2012, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 31), Plaintiff's Memoranda in opposition thereto (ECF Nos. 35, 37), and Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 35), it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED;

2. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Judgment is ENTERED for Plaintiff and against Defendants. The parties are directed to contact the Deputy Clerk to schedule a hearing on the assessment of damages.

BY THE COURT:

______________________

J. CURTIS JOYNER, C.J.


Summaries of

Arnold v. Afflerbach

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 26, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-cv-5742 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 26, 2012)
Case details for

Arnold v. Afflerbach

Case Details

Full title:MARC ANTHONY JAMES ARNOLD, Plaintiff, v. NANCY L. AFFLERBACH, CAROL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Mar 26, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-cv-5742 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 26, 2012)

Citing Cases

Henricks v. Pickaway Corr. Inst.

Countless courts have held that the failure to submit an answer denying a complaint's factual allegations…

Henricks v. Pickaway Corr. Inst.

Countless courts have held that the failure to submit an answer denying a complaint's factual allegations…