From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arnette v. Southern Oregon University

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Aug 9, 2010
Civ. No. 10-3025-CL (D. Or. Aug. 9, 2010)

Opinion

Civ. No. 10-3025-CL.

August 9, 2010


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Although no objections have been filed, this court reviews the legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1983).

I have given this matter de novo review. I agree that defendants are entitled to immunity under the Eleventh Amendment. Accordingly, I ADOPT the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Clarke.

CONCLUSION

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#6) is adopted. Defendants' motion to dismiss (#4) is granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Arnette v. Southern Oregon University

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Aug 9, 2010
Civ. No. 10-3025-CL (D. Or. Aug. 9, 2010)
Case details for

Arnette v. Southern Oregon University

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH ARNETTE, Plaintiff, v. SOUTHERN OREGON UNIVERSITY, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Aug 9, 2010

Citations

Civ. No. 10-3025-CL (D. Or. Aug. 9, 2010)