From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arnette v. Anderson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 6, 2012
No. CIV 2:10-cv-2407-JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 6, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV 2:10-cv-2407-JFM (HC)

02-06-2012

DAVID LEE ARNETTE, Petitioner, v. MARTY C. ANDERSON, Respondent.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On December 28, 2011, respondent filed a motion to dismiss. Petitioner has not filed an opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: "Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . ." Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner show cause, within twenty-one days, why respondent's December 28, 2011 motion to dismiss should not be granted.

______________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Arnette v. Anderson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 6, 2012
No. CIV 2:10-cv-2407-JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Arnette v. Anderson

Case Details

Full title:DAVID LEE ARNETTE, Petitioner, v. MARTY C. ANDERSON, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 6, 2012

Citations

No. CIV 2:10-cv-2407-JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 6, 2012)