From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Arnett v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Jan 20, 2000
8 S.W.3d 34 (Ark. 2000)

Opinion

CR 99-1442

Opinion delivered January 20, 2000

APPEAL ERROR — MOTION FOR RULE ON CLERK — GOOD CAUSE FOR GRANTING. — An admission by an attorney for a criminal defendant that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part is good cause to grant a motion for rule on the clerk.

Motion for Rule on the Clerk; granted.

Wright VanNoy, by: Herbert T. Wright, Jr., for appellant.

No response.


Carolyn Arnett, by her attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.

Her attorney, Herbert T. Wright, Jr., admits in his motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion for rule on the clerk is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.


Summaries of

Arnett v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Jan 20, 2000
8 S.W.3d 34 (Ark. 2000)
Case details for

Arnett v. State

Case Details

Full title:Carolyn ARNETT v. STATE of Arkansas

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Jan 20, 2000

Citations

8 S.W.3d 34 (Ark. 2000)
8 S.W.3d 34